louis vuitton alma replica

 Twitter  Facebook  Google+

    Belier official outlet online x856b492
    Belier official outlet online x856b492

Belier official outlet online x856b492

Fearture:

* Damier Geant canvas in technical fibers identical to those used for climbing ropes, canvas strap, calf leather trimmings, hard-wearing canvas lining
* Brushed aluminum pieces
* Quick release fasteners
* Large zippered inner patch pocket
*...

DAP didn TMt object to Bill TM PETALING JAYA: It is DAP that has empowered PAS louis vuitton agenda illustre and failed to prevent it from tabling the cheap louis vuitton bags japan Private Member Bill to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965, said MCA deputy president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong.

In a statement, Dr Wee said that while MCA, including its backbenchers, actively voiced the objections and concerns of non Muslims on the issue, DAP Members of Parliament did little, apart from blaming Barisan Nasional and MCA. claims that they objected to the Bill but according to Pakatan Harapan chief secretary Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah, Pakatan Harapan apparently never objected to the Bill. the biggest party in Pakatan Harapan, DAP never objected to the Bill? asked Dr Wee. He pointed out how DAP secretary general Lim Guan Eng and PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang had in fact signed an agreement just days before the last general election, where it was acknowledged that differences between the two parties were only at 5%, with PAS free to pursue its Islamic state goal by its own methods. The following is the full statement by Dr Wee: It is incumbent on DAP to halt its tactics of attention, create internal conflict between BN component parties and mislead the rakyat to cover up its failure to prevent PAS from tabling its Private Member Bill to amend the Syariah Court (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 (Act 355). When PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang presented his Private Member Bill, there were 36 DAP Members of Parliament who were in the Parliament building, but not a single one of them was in the Dewan to oppose Hadi speech. When PAS secretary general and Kota Baru MP Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan delivered his seconder speech, he mentioned that when this Act 355 was amended in 1984 and 1989, both Lim Kit Siang and Karpal where can i buy louis vuitton bags online Singh did not object to the amendments then. Gobind Singh and Ramkarpal Singh, were also silent. This shows that DAP has kept its mouth completely shut on three separate occasions. Although MCA has only seven MPs compared to DAP 36, our two backbenchers stood up and raised questions over Hadi Private Member Bill. Not only did they stand up and voice their objections; they bravely expressed the concerns of non Muslims and highlighted how the amendments are unconstitutional. Both the MCA MPs also defended the then MCA Youth chief Tan Sri Lee Kim Sai, explaining that when Act 355 was amended in 1984, Kelantan and Terengganu were not ruled by PAS, and the related state hudud enactments were not even introduced yet. three years jail, six strokes of the rotan and RM5,000 fine. Takiyuddin speech also mentioned the late Karpal Singh but sadly not only did DAP MPs fall silent and louis vuitton alma replica did not oppose the Bill for the rakyat, they could not even defend their leaders from being attacked by PAS in the Dewan Rakyat. Instead of objecting to the Private Member Bill in the Dewan, the DAP MPs were doing Live to attract more in the corridors of the Parliament building. This shows DAP is talented in deploying social media to divert the rakyat attention from its failure to prevent PAS from tabling the proposed amendments to Act 355. MCA, despite being left with only seven MPs, is vocal in defending non Muslims and the future of this nation in the Dewan Rakyat. But DAP MPs, in contrast, just use social media to blame MCA. The Rocket has crashed in its duty to defend the rakyat and failed to deliver the mandate entrusted to it by the rakyat. According to the Standing Orders of Parliament, MPs are allowed to pose questions when a Bill is being tabled or seconded. The appropriate term used in this scenario is called Penjelasan That is why the two MCA backbenchers fully utilised this right to express the rakyat concerns with the Bill. This is the responsibility of an elected representative and shows MCA unflinching stand in opposing Hadi Private Member Bill. DAP leaders only know how to accuse and disparage MCA backbenchers questions as akin to merely posing questions but not opposing. It is even more regrettable that DAP leaders allegedly also claim that Hadi Bill is a decision by the Barisan Nasional Cabinet, but this allegation is completely false.

In actual fact, this Bill is not even a Government Bill and DAP accusations are purely misleading. Also, DAP Kulai MP Teoh Nie Ching must be rebuked for attempting to manufacture an internal conflict among Barisan leaders. Teoh also had the audacity to claim that either my Barisan counterparts or me are telling a lie.


Prev: louis vuitton at saks atlanta
Next: louis vuitton neverfull pm replica